Saturday, May 7, 2011

Psychiatric research on this disease is just plain silly

Mary Sweitzer's written testimony for the May 10,11 2011 CFS Advisory Committee meeting:

Suppose you broke your leg really badly. You knew it, your family knew it, your friends who were with you knew it. Somebody called emergency, and the ER techs came out. They had already been told by your family that you had a broken leg, but they said they had to find out for themselves. They came up to you and said, “Why do you think you have a broken leg?” Startled by the question, you said, “because it is obviously broken!” (Selfreported, one says to the other.) How about you stand up and we can see what’s going on with that leg. “NO!” you responded! “That’s going to hurt!” (Catastrophizer, they murmur among themselves. People who catastrophize about pain are more likely to feel pain.) Then they write a prescription for Prozac, say “Take this until you feel more comfortable about the prospect of standing up,” and they leave.

Now, of course that was a silly story. But it is exactly how I was treated by the first specialist I saw for this disease. “Self-reported” is an insurance term that is used by British psychiatric “experts” on CFS; and there is a published paper out there about CFS and fibromyalgia that uses the correlation between these diseases and fear of pain to conclude that people who fear pain are “catastrophizers,” and “catastrophizing” causes pain. There is a large body of psychiatric research on this disease that is just plain silly.

Read more>>

1 comment:

Ron Graves said...

All illness, at some stage, is self-reported - by patient to GP, for example.

So much for psychiatric "experts" who can't differentiate between self-reported and self-diagnosed.

And it's only self-diagnosed, very often, because nobody listens!


Related Posts with Thumbnails