By David Tuller, lecturer in public health and journalism at the University of California, Berkeley:
They have recently argued, in response to Wilshire et al, that it doesn't matter that some participants were recovered on the physical function or the fatigue outcomes at baseline because there were other recovery criteria. This is truly a bizarre response for researchers to make. It is also a serious violation of the rules of honest scientific inquiry. It is unclear to me why we all have to waste so much intellectual time and energy simply to demonstrate that studies in which participants can be disabled and recovered simultaneously on key indicators should never have been published and, once published, need to be retracted immediately. The PACE authors have no scientific ground to stand on.
MORE @ Observantonline, the journal of the University of Maastricht
1 comment:
I agree, why aren't the papers being retracted and why isn't Queens Mary of London who were responsible for the trial doing something about it???
Post a Comment