Thursday, June 30, 2011

Professor Julia Newton, University of Newcastle: When exercising CFS patients exhibit profound abnormalities in bioenergetic function


European Journal of Clinical Investigation © 2011 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation

1. David EJ Jones MD PhD1,†, 2. Kieren G Hollingsworth PhD1,2,†, 3. Djordje G Jakovljevic PhD3,4,5, 4. Gulnar Fattakhova MD3,4, 5. Jessie Pairman3,4, 6. Andrew M Blamire PhD1,2, 7. Michael I Trenell PhD1,4,5,‡, 8. Julia L Newton MD PhD3,4,‡

Author Information

1 Institute of Cellular Medicine
2 Newcastle Magnetic Resonance Centre
3 Institute for Ageing and Health
4 the UK NIHR Biomedical Research Centre in Ageing and Age Related Diseases
5 Newcastle Centre for Brain Ageing and Vitality. Newcastle University, UK

*Correspondence: Professor Julia L Newton Institute for Ageing and Health Medical School Framlington Place Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4HH, UK Email:

Publication History

1. Accepted manuscript online: 10 JUN 2011 11:17AM EST
2. Received Date: 16-Mar-2011, Accepted Date: 05-Jun-2011

Background:  Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) patients frequently describe difficulties with repeat exercise. Here we explore muscle bioenergetic function in response to 3 bouts of exercise.

Methods:  18 CFS (CDC 1994) patients and 12 sedentary controls underwent assessment of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), repeat exercise with magnetic resonance spectroscopy and cardio-respiratory fitness test to determine anaerobic threshold.

Results:  CFS patients undertaking MVC fell into 2 distinct groups. 8 (45%) showed normal PCr depletion in response to exercise at 35% of MVC (PCr depletion >33%; lower 95% CI for controls). 10 CFS patients had low PCr depletion (generating abnormally low MVC values). The CFS whole group exhibited significantly reduced anaerobic threshold, heart rate, VO2, VO2 peak and peak work compared to controls. Resting muscle pH was similar in controls and both CFS patient groups. However, the CFS group achieving normal PCr depletion values showed increased intra-muscular acidosis compared to controls after similar work after each of the 3 exercise periods with no apparent reduction in acidosis with repeat exercise of the type reported in normal subjects. This CFS group also exhibited significant prolongation (almost 4-fold) of the time taken for pH to recover to baseline.

Conclusion:  When exercising to comparable levels to normal controls CFS patients exhibit profound abnormality in bioenergetic function and response to it. Although exercise intervention is the logical treatment for patients showing acidosis any trial must exclude subjects who do not initiate exercise as they will not benefit. This potentially explains previous mixed results in CFS exercise trials.

See also: The main characteristic of ME is an abnormally delayed muscle recovery after doing trivial things, if you don't have that, you don't have ME

1 comment:

Justin said...

They say that the solution for our 50x normal acidosis is GET!

As in many of these ridiculous papers, they find actual physical pathology and then in the conclusion warp it some way to suggest GET and/or psychogenesis.

The last two sentences are very troubling to me. It says that ME should be treated with 'exercise intervention' (GET) because this is the proper treatment for acidosis. Also says that pw"CFS" who do not normally exercise should be excluded from any study because they may not comply with the GET instructions and thus artificially lower the measured effectiveness of GET in trials like PACE. Obviously, if pw-Oxford defined "CFS" who normally exercise are studied, all of the people in the study will have Idiopathic Chronic Fatigue not ME.


Related Posts with Thumbnails